India Reaffirms Conventional Military Stance Amid Pakistan Nuclear Speculation
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) dismissed speculations surrounding alleged damage to a nuclear facility in Pakistan’s Kirana Hills, reiterating that India's recent military action was strictly within conventional limits and directed only at terrorist infrastructure.
During a weekly media briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal was questioned about reports linking Operation Sindoor to potential damage at Pakistani nuclear sites and the involvement of foreign aircraft.
“Questions regarding Egyptian or American aircraft are for Pakistan to answer, not us,” Jaiswal said. “Our objectives and actions were clearly outlined during the defence briefing. The Pakistani minister has already commented on the matter.”
‘No Nuclear Escalation, No Blackmail’
Clarifying India’s position, Jaiswal asserted that the military operation remained entirely within the “conventional domain.” Reports suggesting a meeting of Pakistan’s National Command Authority (NCA), which oversees nuclear weapons policy, were denied by Islamabad itself, he pointed out.
“India’s policy remains firm — we will not succumb to nuclear blackmail, nor will we allow cross-border terrorism to dictate regional security,” he added. “We have consistently conveyed to global partners that endorsing nuclear brinkmanship only destabilizes their own regions.”
Responding to Trump's Claims
Jaiswal was also asked to respond to former U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent remarks claiming that American intervention had averted a potential nuclear clash between India and Pakistan. Dismissing any nuclear threat from India’s side, Jaiswal reiterated, “Our military actions were conventional. While there were unconfirmed reports about Pakistan’s NCA convening, these were officially denied. Even Pakistan’s foreign minister ruled out any nuclear involvement.”
Shift in Pakistan’s Stance After Operation Sindoor
India’s strikes during Operation Sindoor reportedly targeted and dismantled terror infrastructure in areas such as Bahawalpur, Muridke, and Muzaffarabad. According to Jaiswal, these actions significantly degraded Pakistan’s military capabilities and led to a shift in its posture.
“In the past week, we took decisive action against Pakistan’s terror hubs. Their military capabilities were diminished, and key airbases were neutralized,” Jaiswal said. “Pakistan’s foreign minister may try to frame this as a diplomatic win, but the facts speak for themselves. India’s position was consistent from day one: we would strike terrorist infrastructure and respond appropriately if attacked.”
He further noted that Pakistan’s stance changed dramatically after the morning of May 10, when Indian strikes crippled several key military facilities. “From threatening massive retaliation, they pivoted to seeking a ceasefire. It’s clear who initiated contact to halt hostilities,” he said.
‘Let the Satellite Images Speak’
Urging journalists and analysts to examine commercial satellite imagery of the conflict zones, Jaiswal emphasized the stark contrast between Pakistani claims and the damage sustained.
“Review the satellite images of what they claim to have hit in India, and compare that with what we successfully destroyed. The evidence is there,” he said. “Claiming victory after the fact is a familiar pattern.”
As tensions cool following the recent escalation, India continues to assert its right to defend against cross-border terrorism while upholding its policy of restraint and conventional military engagement.
