A reform that was overdue
The laws have to be 'strong' in the first instance but their implementation also has to be just and 'untainted'
India, under the regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has achieved a rare success in emerging as a world power whose voice mattered on the issues of global peace and economic advancement.
However, in the area of internal governance, the country’s image was getting somewhat marred primarily because law and order - a subject exclusively falling in the ambit of responsibility of State governments - was not being handled well for a variety of reasons of which 'politicisation' of police was perhaps the most important.
A voice for police reforms was consistently raised, a debate was set in motion about the share of responsibility of the police leadership that was by and large in the hands of IPS officers and even the highest judiciary of the land had played a helpful part by laying down guidelines on the crucial matter of appointment of the Director General of Police (DGP) of the State.
Maintenance of law and order is the first duty of the State regardless of the political complexion of the ruling elite and the law recognised the investigation of a cognizable crime as a sovereign function of the Police.
It is in this context that Home Minister Amit Shah deserves a huge round of applause for tabling a comprehensive set of reforms in Parliament in respect of the basic legal framework contained in IPC, CRPC and Indian Evidence Act - in the spirit of highlighting the need for a sovereign nation like India to adopt an integral Code of law of its own, appropriately disowning any ‘colonial’ legacies and ensuring a uniform system of law and order management throughout the length and breadth of this country.
He apparently set in motion an in-depth examination of this huge task a long time ago. It is now incumbent on all Indians to take a deep interest in the future debates in Parliament whenever the proposed laws come up there for discussion.
The laws have to be 'strong' in the first instance but their implementation also has to be just and 'untainted'.
The police leadership has to be professionally effective to ensure that the handling of order and law both is impartial - being protective of the law-abiding citizens and capable of producing deterrence for the law-breakers.
Of course, the execution of any law has to be evidence-based and if the use of digital media was made for causing subversion, fostering terrorism and inciting separatist violence, admissibility of evidence has to include digital channels as well.
There are strong laws available for dealing with hate speeches that incited communal discord but their implementation was not as prompt - one inadequacy was about the inability of the police to produce the 'record' of the speech as evidence.
The creation of strong laws has to go with the exercise of reinforcing the police leadership to ensure impartial management of law and order and improve the working of police stations which are the establishment of legal authority closest to the citizens. The Centre would have a legitimate role in the appointment of DGP if the process of selection for the post prescribed that this would be made only out of the panel of three drawn by UPSC on the basis of seniority-cum-merit, in consultation with the State government.
The persistent malady of police stations not registering a complaint of a cognizable offence has kept the image of police stations low in the eyes of citizens.
In the CRPC, it is clearly laid down that all senior officers enjoyed the power of Station House Officer throughout their respective jurisdiction which was an affirmation that IPS officers were expected to oversee and improve the working of the police station. This unfortunately had not been achieved to the desired extent during the long existence of this service.
It goes without saying that a far greater allocation of funds was needed to ensure all of this - in times of Home Minister Amit Shah the work of modernisation of Police had been stepped up, particularly in the field of computerisation and speedy communication.
There are three areas of criminality that the country's Penal Code had to still work on - they represent the unhappy outcome of the mismatch that had been created between a competitive material advancement and the sociological progress that should go with it.
Of these three, one is the obnoxious 'ragging' in educational institutions of higher learning that resulted in suicides in many cases.
Acts of criminality in the name of ragging were totally unacceptable and a set of laws should be framed that put a basic share of responsibility for the same on the head of that institution as well.
Ragging began in Medical Colleges as a practice devised to make the freshers familiar with the seniors with whom the former had to work closely as a team and it was totally free of anything that amounted to the use of physical force.
The second cause for concern - essentially a case of corruption resulting from the decay of moral values - is the growing frequency of leakage of question papers of competitive examinations, by those who were a part of the controlling mechanism. A separate law is needed to prevent such scams.
And finally, the rising graph of induction of children in beggary in metropolitan centres, in particular, needs to be taken note of - not only from the angle of poverty alleviation but more importantly for the likelihood of this having been made a ‘cartel’ activity.
In the time of Home Minister Amit Shah, serious efforts are being made to strengthen internal security against the new threats materialising through misuse of social media and other covert means.
The frequency of gruesome murders, attacks on women and cases of public violence add up to creating an impression of lawlessness that does not do credit to democratic governance.
Failures of State governments and State police are spoiling India’s national image before the world as the outsiders did not understand the federal system of this country that gave total control to the State over the police and made the Centre somewhat of a mere observer.
The focus of policing has to be on police stations - the country should demonstrate this by appointing gazetted officers as Station House Officers who would be assisted by Inspectors and Sub Inspectors in various spheres of duty.
The staff of the District Intelligence Unit should be specifically assigned to important police stations.
Adequate mobility for visiting the ‘scene of occurrence’ has to be there- this remains a glaring weakness even now. Hospitals and public clinics must respond to any sudden requests emanating from the District SP. There should be no hesitation about invoking Art 311 of the Constitution against a ‘rogue’ policeman.
For IPS officers who lead the Police forces of States, the Centre should reinforce the arrangement that protects them from any politically motivated action initiated by a State government against them. By the same logic however, Centre should also be in a position to reprimand an IPS officer for proven incompetence, political taint or failure to play his or her part in a situation of duty.
Strong laws, their impartial implementation and consensus among the politicians to keep law and order and internal security above party politics, are the three requirements of the eco-system that should be created to keep democratic governance going.
(The writer is a former Director of the Intelligence Bureau. Views expressed are personal)